Equatorial Guinea vs Macau, China: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions excluding LULUCF per capita

Equatorial Guinea
2.55 t CO2e/capita
in 2024
Macau, China
2.53 t CO2e/capita
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea rank
102nd
Macau, China rank
103rd

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions excluding LULUCF per capita over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Macau, China
0246197019972024

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 2.55 t CO2e/capita against 2.53 t CO2e/capita in Macau, China, a difference of 0.02 t CO2e/capita.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Macau, China ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 102nd and Macau, China ranks 103rd of 203 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 2 and Macau, China in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Macau, China Difference Ahead
1970s 0.1555 t CO2e/capita 1.6 t CO2e/capita 1.44 t CO2e/capita Macau, China
1980s 0.1592 t CO2e/capita 2.28 t CO2e/capita 2.12 t CO2e/capita Macau, China
1990s 1.81 t CO2e/capita 3.27 t CO2e/capita 1.46 t CO2e/capita Macau, China
2000s 5.49 t CO2e/capita 3.75 t CO2e/capita 1.74 t CO2e/capita Equatorial Guinea
2010s 3.91 t CO2e/capita 3.51 t CO2e/capita 0.3945 t CO2e/capita Equatorial Guinea
2020s 2.73 t CO2e/capita 2.75 t CO2e/capita 0.0129 t CO2e/capita Macau, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) emissions excluding lulucf per capita, Equatorial Guinea or Macau, China?
Equatorial Guinea, at 2.55 t CO2e/capita against 2.53 t CO2e/capita in Macau, China as of 2024.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) emissions excluding lulucf per capita between Equatorial Guinea and Macau, China?
0.02 t CO2e/capita, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Macau, China?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Macau, China rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) emissions excluding lulucf per capita?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 102nd and Macau, China ranks 103rd of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions excluding LULUCF per capita (t CO2e/capita). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Macau, China: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions excluding LULUCF per capita. Statizoid, drawing on EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-excluding-lulucf-per-capita-t-co2e-capita/equatorial-guinea/macao-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-excluding-lulucf-per-capita-t-co2e-capita/equatorial-guinea/macao-sar-china/">Equatorial Guinea vs Macau, China: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions excluding LULUCF per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions excluding LULUCF per capita (t CO2e/capita)
Unit
t CO2e/capita
Source
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
250 places, 13,750 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Total annual emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2), one of the six Kyoto greenhouse gases (GHG), from the agriculture, energy, waste, and industrial sectors, excluding LULUCF, standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values divided by the economy's population. This measure excludes GHG fluxes caused by Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF), as these fluxes have larger uncertainties.