Georgia vs Republic of Moldova: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions excluding LULUCF per capita

Georgia
3.53 t CO2e/capita
in 2024
Republic of Moldova
3.42 t CO2e/capita
in 2024
Georgia rank
85th
Republic of Moldova rank
87th

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions excluding LULUCF per capita over time

  • Georgia
  • Republic of Moldova
0246810197019972024

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 3.53 t CO2e/capita against 3.42 t CO2e/capita in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 0.11 t CO2e/capita.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Republic of Moldova ahead.

Georgia ranks 85th and Republic of Moldova ranks 87th of 203 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 1 and Republic of Moldova in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Republic of Moldova Difference Ahead
1970s 6.58 t CO2e/capita 9.15 t CO2e/capita 2.57 t CO2e/capita Republic of Moldova
1980s 7.02 t CO2e/capita 10.57 t CO2e/capita 3.55 t CO2e/capita Republic of Moldova
1990s 2.99 t CO2e/capita 5.33 t CO2e/capita 2.34 t CO2e/capita Republic of Moldova
2000s 1.29 t CO2e/capita 2.67 t CO2e/capita 1.39 t CO2e/capita Republic of Moldova
2010s 2.6 t CO2e/capita 2.99 t CO2e/capita 0.3931 t CO2e/capita Republic of Moldova
2020s 3.45 t CO2e/capita 3.42 t CO2e/capita 0.0251 t CO2e/capita Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) emissions excluding lulucf per capita, Georgia or Republic of Moldova?
Georgia, at 3.53 t CO2e/capita against 3.42 t CO2e/capita in Republic of Moldova as of 2024.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) emissions excluding lulucf per capita between Georgia and Republic of Moldova?
0.11 t CO2e/capita, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Republic of Moldova?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Georgia and Republic of Moldova rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) emissions excluding lulucf per capita?
Georgia ranks 85th and Republic of Moldova ranks 87th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions excluding LULUCF per capita (t CO2e/capita). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs Republic of Moldova: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions excluding LULUCF per capita. Statizoid, drawing on EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-excluding-lulucf-per-capita-t-co2e-capita/georgia/moldova/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-excluding-lulucf-per-capita-t-co2e-capita/georgia/moldova/">Georgia vs Republic of Moldova: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions excluding LULUCF per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions excluding LULUCF per capita (t CO2e/capita)
Unit
t CO2e/capita
Source
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
250 places, 13,750 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Total annual emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2), one of the six Kyoto greenhouse gases (GHG), from the agriculture, energy, waste, and industrial sectors, excluding LULUCF, standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values divided by the economy's population. This measure excludes GHG fluxes caused by Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF), as these fluxes have larger uncertainties.