Hong Kong, China vs Lithuania: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions excluding LULUCF per capita

Hong Kong, China
4.6 t CO2e/capita
in 2024
Lithuania
4.49 t CO2e/capita
in 2024
Hong Kong, China rank
58th
Lithuania rank
61st

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions excluding LULUCF per capita over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Lithuania
246810197019972024

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 4.6 t CO2e/capita against 4.49 t CO2e/capita in Lithuania, a difference of 0.11 t CO2e/capita.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Lithuania ahead.

Hong Kong, China ranks 58th and Lithuania ranks 61st of 203 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Hong Kong, China averaged higher in 3 and Lithuania in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Lithuania Difference Ahead
1970s 2.74 t CO2e/capita 7.59 t CO2e/capita 4.86 t CO2e/capita Lithuania
1980s 4.62 t CO2e/capita 9.24 t CO2e/capita 4.62 t CO2e/capita Lithuania
1990s 6.48 t CO2e/capita 5.48 t CO2e/capita 0.9961 t CO2e/capita Hong Kong, China
2000s 6.28 t CO2e/capita 4.05 t CO2e/capita 2.23 t CO2e/capita Hong Kong, China
2010s 6.15 t CO2e/capita 4.75 t CO2e/capita 1.41 t CO2e/capita Hong Kong, China
2020s 4.54 t CO2e/capita 4.77 t CO2e/capita 0.2245 t CO2e/capita Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) emissions excluding lulucf per capita, Hong Kong, China or Lithuania?
Hong Kong, China, at 4.6 t CO2e/capita against 4.49 t CO2e/capita in Lithuania as of 2024.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) emissions excluding lulucf per capita between Hong Kong, China and Lithuania?
0.11 t CO2e/capita, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Lithuania?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Hong Kong, China and Lithuania rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) emissions excluding lulucf per capita?
Hong Kong, China ranks 58th and Lithuania ranks 61st of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions excluding LULUCF per capita (t CO2e/capita). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Lithuania: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions excluding LULUCF per capita. Statizoid, drawing on EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-excluding-lulucf-per-capita-t-co2e-capita/hong-kong-sar-china/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-excluding-lulucf-per-capita-t-co2e-capita/hong-kong-sar-china/lithuania/">Hong Kong, China vs Lithuania: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions excluding LULUCF per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions excluding LULUCF per capita (t CO2e/capita)
Unit
t CO2e/capita
Source
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
250 places, 13,750 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Total annual emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2), one of the six Kyoto greenhouse gases (GHG), from the agriculture, energy, waste, and industrial sectors, excluding LULUCF, standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values divided by the economy's population. This measure excludes GHG fluxes caused by Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF), as these fluxes have larger uncertainties.