Indonesia vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions excluding LULUCF per capita

Indonesia
2.87 t CO2e/capita
in 2024
Saint Kitts and Nevis
2.88 t CO2e/capita
in 2024
Indonesia rank
95th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
94th

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions excluding LULUCF per capita over time

  • Indonesia
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
0123197019972024

How they compare

Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 2.88 t CO2e/capita against 2.87 t CO2e/capita in Indonesia, a difference of 0.01 t CO2e/capita.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.

Indonesia ranks 95th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 94th of 203 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Indonesia averaged higher in 3 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Indonesia Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1970s 0.4037 t CO2e/capita 0.4069 t CO2e/capita 0.0032 t CO2e/capita Saint Kitts and Nevis
1980s 0.654 t CO2e/capita 0.4498 t CO2e/capita 0.2041 t CO2e/capita Indonesia
1990s 1.14 t CO2e/capita 0.8152 t CO2e/capita 0.3224 t CO2e/capita Indonesia
2000s 1.57 t CO2e/capita 1.43 t CO2e/capita 0.1439 t CO2e/capita Indonesia
2010s 2 t CO2e/capita 2.13 t CO2e/capita 0.1307 t CO2e/capita Saint Kitts and Nevis
2020s 2.52 t CO2e/capita 2.7 t CO2e/capita 0.1746 t CO2e/capita Saint Kitts and Nevis

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) emissions excluding lulucf per capita, Indonesia or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 2.88 t CO2e/capita against 2.87 t CO2e/capita in Indonesia as of 2024.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) emissions excluding lulucf per capita between Indonesia and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0.01 t CO2e/capita, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Indonesia and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) emissions excluding lulucf per capita?
Indonesia ranks 95th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 94th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions excluding LULUCF per capita (t CO2e/capita). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Indonesia vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions excluding LULUCF per capita. Statizoid, drawing on EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-excluding-lulucf-per-capita-t-co2e-capita/indonesia/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-excluding-lulucf-per-capita-t-co2e-capita/indonesia/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Indonesia vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions excluding LULUCF per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions excluding LULUCF per capita (t CO2e/capita)
Unit
t CO2e/capita
Source
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
250 places, 13,750 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Total annual emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2), one of the six Kyoto greenhouse gases (GHG), from the agriculture, energy, waste, and industrial sectors, excluding LULUCF, standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values divided by the economy's population. This measure excludes GHG fluxes caused by Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF), as these fluxes have larger uncertainties.