New Caledonia vs OECD members: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions excluding LULUCF per capita

New Caledonia
17.08 t CO2e/capita
in 2024
OECD members
7.92 t CO2e/capita
in 2024
New Caledonia rank
10th
OECD members rank
7th

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions excluding LULUCF per capita over time

  • New Caledonia
  • OECD members
5101520197019972024

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports 17.08 t CO2e/capita against 7.92 t CO2e/capita in OECD members, a difference of 9.16 t CO2e/capita.

That makes New Caledonia's figure about 2.2 times OECD members's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was OECD members ahead.

New Caledonia ranks 10th and OECD members ranks 7th of 203 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, New Caledonia averaged higher in 2 and OECD members in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Caledonia OECD members Difference Ahead
1970s 10.12 t CO2e/capita 11.43 t CO2e/capita 1.32 t CO2e/capita OECD members
1980s 8.66 t CO2e/capita 10.73 t CO2e/capita 2.07 t CO2e/capita OECD members
1990s 8.86 t CO2e/capita 10.78 t CO2e/capita 1.93 t CO2e/capita OECD members
2000s 10.59 t CO2e/capita 10.84 t CO2e/capita 0.2533 t CO2e/capita OECD members
2010s 16.15 t CO2e/capita 9.55 t CO2e/capita 6.61 t CO2e/capita New Caledonia
2020s 17.23 t CO2e/capita 8.2 t CO2e/capita 9.03 t CO2e/capita New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) emissions excluding lulucf per capita, New Caledonia or OECD members?
New Caledonia, at 17.08 t CO2e/capita against 7.92 t CO2e/capita in OECD members as of 2024.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) emissions excluding lulucf per capita between New Caledonia and OECD members?
9.16 t CO2e/capita, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and OECD members?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do New Caledonia and OECD members rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) emissions excluding lulucf per capita?
New Caledonia ranks 10th and OECD members ranks 7th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions excluding LULUCF per capita (t CO2e/capita). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Caledonia vs OECD members: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions excluding LULUCF per capita. Statizoid, drawing on EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-excluding-lulucf-per-capita-t-co2e-capita/new-caledonia/oecd-members/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-excluding-lulucf-per-capita-t-co2e-capita/new-caledonia/oecd-members/">New Caledonia vs OECD members: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions excluding LULUCF per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions excluding LULUCF per capita (t CO2e/capita)
Unit
t CO2e/capita
Source
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
250 places, 13,750 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Total annual emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2), one of the six Kyoto greenhouse gases (GHG), from the agriculture, energy, waste, and industrial sectors, excluding LULUCF, standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values divided by the economy's population. This measure excludes GHG fluxes caused by Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF), as these fluxes have larger uncertainties.