New Caledonia vs Saudi Arabia: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions excluding LULUCF per capita

New Caledonia
17.08 t CO2e/capita
in 2024
Saudi Arabia
18.48 t CO2e/capita
in 2024
New Caledonia rank
10th
Saudi Arabia rank
8th

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions excluding LULUCF per capita over time

  • New Caledonia
  • Saudi Arabia
102030197019972024

How they compare

Saudi Arabia currently reports 18.48 t CO2e/capita against 17.08 t CO2e/capita in New Caledonia, a difference of 1.4 t CO2e/capita.

That makes Saudi Arabia's figure about 1.1 times New Caledonia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.

New Caledonia ranks 10th and Saudi Arabia ranks 8th of 203 countries.

Saudi Arabia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Caledonia Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
1970s 10.12 t CO2e/capita 22.63 t CO2e/capita 12.51 t CO2e/capita Saudi Arabia
1980s 8.66 t CO2e/capita 21.04 t CO2e/capita 12.37 t CO2e/capita Saudi Arabia
1990s 8.86 t CO2e/capita 16.46 t CO2e/capita 7.61 t CO2e/capita Saudi Arabia
2000s 10.59 t CO2e/capita 16.97 t CO2e/capita 6.38 t CO2e/capita Saudi Arabia
2010s 16.15 t CO2e/capita 19.99 t CO2e/capita 3.83 t CO2e/capita Saudi Arabia
2020s 17.23 t CO2e/capita 18.82 t CO2e/capita 1.59 t CO2e/capita Saudi Arabia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) emissions excluding lulucf per capita, New Caledonia or Saudi Arabia?
Saudi Arabia, at 18.48 t CO2e/capita against 17.08 t CO2e/capita in New Caledonia as of 2024.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) emissions excluding lulucf per capita between New Caledonia and Saudi Arabia?
1.4 t CO2e/capita, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Saudi Arabia?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do New Caledonia and Saudi Arabia rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) emissions excluding lulucf per capita?
New Caledonia ranks 10th and Saudi Arabia ranks 8th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions excluding LULUCF per capita (t CO2e/capita). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Caledonia vs Saudi Arabia: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions excluding LULUCF per capita. Statizoid, drawing on EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-excluding-lulucf-per-capita-t-co2e-capita/new-caledonia/saudi-arabia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-excluding-lulucf-per-capita-t-co2e-capita/new-caledonia/saudi-arabia/">New Caledonia vs Saudi Arabia: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions excluding LULUCF per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions excluding LULUCF per capita (t CO2e/capita)
Unit
t CO2e/capita
Source
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
250 places, 13,750 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Total annual emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2), one of the six Kyoto greenhouse gases (GHG), from the agriculture, energy, waste, and industrial sectors, excluding LULUCF, standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values divided by the economy's population. This measure excludes GHG fluxes caused by Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF), as these fluxes have larger uncertainties.