OECD members vs Saudi Arabia: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions excluding LULUCF per capita

OECD members
7.92 t CO2e/capita
in 2024
Saudi Arabia
18.48 t CO2e/capita
in 2024
OECD members rank
7th
Saudi Arabia rank
8th

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions excluding LULUCF per capita over time

  • OECD members
  • Saudi Arabia
1015202530197019972024

How they compare

Saudi Arabia currently reports 18.48 t CO2e/capita against 7.92 t CO2e/capita in OECD members, a difference of 10.56 t CO2e/capita.

That makes Saudi Arabia's figure about 2.3 times OECD members's.

Across all 55 years both countries report, Saudi Arabia has been ahead every year.

OECD members ranks 7th and Saudi Arabia ranks 8th of 47 groups.

Saudi Arabia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade OECD members Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
1970s 11.43 t CO2e/capita 22.63 t CO2e/capita 11.19 t CO2e/capita Saudi Arabia
1980s 10.73 t CO2e/capita 21.04 t CO2e/capita 10.31 t CO2e/capita Saudi Arabia
1990s 10.78 t CO2e/capita 16.46 t CO2e/capita 5.68 t CO2e/capita Saudi Arabia
2000s 10.84 t CO2e/capita 16.97 t CO2e/capita 6.13 t CO2e/capita Saudi Arabia
2010s 9.55 t CO2e/capita 19.99 t CO2e/capita 10.44 t CO2e/capita Saudi Arabia
2020s 8.2 t CO2e/capita 18.82 t CO2e/capita 10.62 t CO2e/capita Saudi Arabia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) emissions excluding lulucf per capita, OECD members or Saudi Arabia?
Saudi Arabia, at 18.48 t CO2e/capita against 7.92 t CO2e/capita in OECD members as of 2024.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) emissions excluding lulucf per capita between OECD members and Saudi Arabia?
10.56 t CO2e/capita, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for OECD members and Saudi Arabia?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do OECD members and Saudi Arabia rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) emissions excluding lulucf per capita?
OECD members ranks 7th and Saudi Arabia ranks 8th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions excluding LULUCF per capita (t CO2e/capita). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

OECD members vs Saudi Arabia: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions excluding LULUCF per capita. Statizoid, drawing on EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-excluding-lulucf-per-capita-t-co2e-capita/oecd-members/saudi-arabia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-excluding-lulucf-per-capita-t-co2e-capita/oecd-members/saudi-arabia/">OECD members vs Saudi Arabia: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions excluding LULUCF per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions excluding LULUCF per capita (t CO2e/capita)
Unit
t CO2e/capita
Source
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
250 places, 13,750 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Total annual emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2), one of the six Kyoto greenhouse gases (GHG), from the agriculture, energy, waste, and industrial sectors, excluding LULUCF, standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values divided by the economy's population. This measure excludes GHG fluxes caused by Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF), as these fluxes have larger uncertainties.