Pacific island small states vs South Africa: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions excluding LULUCF per capita

Pacific island small states
1.53 t CO2e/capita
in 2024
South Africa
6.88 t CO2e/capita
in 2024
Pacific island small states rank
35th
South Africa rank
36th

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions excluding LULUCF per capita over time

  • Pacific island small states
  • South Africa
246810197019972024

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 6.88 t CO2e/capita against 1.53 t CO2e/capita in Pacific island small states, a difference of 5.35 t CO2e/capita.

That makes South Africa's figure about 4.5 times Pacific island small states's.

Across all 55 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.

Pacific island small states ranks 35th and South Africa ranks 36th of 47 groups.

South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Pacific island small states South Africa Difference Ahead
1970s 2.48 t CO2e/capita 8.49 t CO2e/capita 6.02 t CO2e/capita South Africa
1980s 2.12 t CO2e/capita 8.11 t CO2e/capita 5.99 t CO2e/capita South Africa
1990s 2.07 t CO2e/capita 7.36 t CO2e/capita 5.29 t CO2e/capita South Africa
2000s 1.9 t CO2e/capita 8.45 t CO2e/capita 6.55 t CO2e/capita South Africa
2010s 1.76 t CO2e/capita 8.37 t CO2e/capita 6.61 t CO2e/capita South Africa
2020s 1.47 t CO2e/capita 7.05 t CO2e/capita 5.58 t CO2e/capita South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) emissions excluding lulucf per capita, Pacific island small states or South Africa?
South Africa, at 6.88 t CO2e/capita against 1.53 t CO2e/capita in Pacific island small states as of 2024.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) emissions excluding lulucf per capita between Pacific island small states and South Africa?
5.35 t CO2e/capita, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Pacific island small states and South Africa?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Pacific island small states and South Africa rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) emissions excluding lulucf per capita?
Pacific island small states ranks 35th and South Africa ranks 36th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions excluding LULUCF per capita (t CO2e/capita). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Pacific island small states vs South Africa: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions excluding LULUCF per capita. Statizoid, drawing on EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-excluding-lulucf-per-capita-t-co2e-capita/pacific-island-small-states/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-excluding-lulucf-per-capita-t-co2e-capita/pacific-island-small-states/south-africa/">Pacific island small states vs South Africa: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions excluding LULUCF per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions excluding LULUCF per capita (t CO2e/capita)
Unit
t CO2e/capita
Source
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
250 places, 13,750 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Total annual emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2), one of the six Kyoto greenhouse gases (GHG), from the agriculture, energy, waste, and industrial sectors, excluding LULUCF, standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values divided by the economy's population. This measure excludes GHG fluxes caused by Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF), as these fluxes have larger uncertainties.