Panama vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions excluding LULUCF per capita

Panama
2.74 t CO2e/capita
in 2024
Saint Kitts and Nevis
2.88 t CO2e/capita
in 2024
Panama rank
97th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
94th

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions excluding LULUCF per capita over time

  • Panama
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
0123197019972024

How they compare

Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 2.88 t CO2e/capita against 2.74 t CO2e/capita in Panama, a difference of 0.14 t CO2e/capita.

That makes Saint Kitts and Nevis's figure about 1.1 times Panama's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Panama ahead.

Panama ranks 97th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 94th of 203 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Panama averaged higher in 5 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Panama Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1970s 1.78 t CO2e/capita 0.4069 t CO2e/capita 1.37 t CO2e/capita Panama
1980s 1.37 t CO2e/capita 0.4498 t CO2e/capita 0.9251 t CO2e/capita Panama
1990s 1.53 t CO2e/capita 0.8152 t CO2e/capita 0.7165 t CO2e/capita Panama
2000s 1.99 t CO2e/capita 1.43 t CO2e/capita 0.5666 t CO2e/capita Panama
2010s 2.68 t CO2e/capita 2.13 t CO2e/capita 0.5422 t CO2e/capita Panama
2020s 2.59 t CO2e/capita 2.7 t CO2e/capita 0.1121 t CO2e/capita Saint Kitts and Nevis

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) emissions excluding lulucf per capita, Panama or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 2.88 t CO2e/capita against 2.74 t CO2e/capita in Panama as of 2024.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) emissions excluding lulucf per capita between Panama and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0.14 t CO2e/capita, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Panama and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) emissions excluding lulucf per capita?
Panama ranks 97th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 94th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions excluding LULUCF per capita (t CO2e/capita). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Panama vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions excluding LULUCF per capita. Statizoid, drawing on EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-excluding-lulucf-per-capita-t-co2e-capita/panama/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-excluding-lulucf-per-capita-t-co2e-capita/panama/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Panama vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions excluding LULUCF per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions excluding LULUCF per capita (t CO2e/capita)
Unit
t CO2e/capita
Source
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
250 places, 13,750 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Total annual emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2), one of the six Kyoto greenhouse gases (GHG), from the agriculture, energy, waste, and industrial sectors, excluding LULUCF, standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values divided by the economy's population. This measure excludes GHG fluxes caused by Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF), as these fluxes have larger uncertainties.