Small states vs Turkmenistan: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions excluding LULUCF per capita

Small states
4.42 t CO2e/capita
in 2024
Turkmenistan
10.86 t CO2e/capita
in 2024
Small states rank
20th
Turkmenistan rank
18th

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions excluding LULUCF per capita over time

  • Small states
  • Turkmenistan
468101214197019972024

How they compare

Turkmenistan currently reports 10.86 t CO2e/capita against 4.42 t CO2e/capita in Small states, a difference of 6.44 t CO2e/capita.

That makes Turkmenistan's figure about 2.5 times Small states's.

Across all 55 years both countries report, Turkmenistan has been ahead every year.

Small states ranks 20th and Turkmenistan ranks 18th of 47 groups.

Turkmenistan has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Small states Turkmenistan Difference Ahead
1970s 5.14 t CO2e/capita 9.15 t CO2e/capita 4.01 t CO2e/capita Turkmenistan
1980s 5.67 t CO2e/capita 10.64 t CO2e/capita 4.97 t CO2e/capita Turkmenistan
1990s 4.83 t CO2e/capita 8.34 t CO2e/capita 3.51 t CO2e/capita Turkmenistan
2000s 5.52 t CO2e/capita 10.09 t CO2e/capita 4.56 t CO2e/capita Turkmenistan
2010s 5.73 t CO2e/capita 11.04 t CO2e/capita 5.31 t CO2e/capita Turkmenistan
2020s 4.59 t CO2e/capita 12.45 t CO2e/capita 7.86 t CO2e/capita Turkmenistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) emissions excluding lulucf per capita, Small states or Turkmenistan?
Turkmenistan, at 10.86 t CO2e/capita against 4.42 t CO2e/capita in Small states as of 2024.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) emissions excluding lulucf per capita between Small states and Turkmenistan?
6.44 t CO2e/capita, with Turkmenistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Small states and Turkmenistan?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Small states and Turkmenistan rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) emissions excluding lulucf per capita?
Small states ranks 20th and Turkmenistan ranks 18th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions excluding LULUCF per capita (t CO2e/capita). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Small states vs Turkmenistan: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions excluding LULUCF per capita. Statizoid, drawing on EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-excluding-lulucf-per-capita-t-co2e-capita/small-states/turkmenistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-excluding-lulucf-per-capita-t-co2e-capita/small-states/turkmenistan/">Small states vs Turkmenistan: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions excluding LULUCF per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions excluding LULUCF per capita (t CO2e/capita)
Unit
t CO2e/capita
Source
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
250 places, 13,750 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Total annual emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2), one of the six Kyoto greenhouse gases (GHG), from the agriculture, energy, waste, and industrial sectors, excluding LULUCF, standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values divided by the economy's population. This measure excludes GHG fluxes caused by Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF), as these fluxes have larger uncertainties.