Belarus vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Agriculture
Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Agriculture over time
- Belarus
- Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
How they compare
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) currently reports 4.36 Mt CO2e against 0.671 Mt CO2e in Belarus, a difference of 3.69 Mt CO2e.
That makes Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)'s figure about 6.5 times Belarus's.
Across all 55 years both countries report, Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 33rd and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 34th of 109 countries.
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0 Mt CO2e | 0.7339 Mt CO2e | 0.7339 Mt CO2e | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) |
| 1980s | 0 Mt CO2e | 0.9015 Mt CO2e | 0.9015 Mt CO2e | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) |
| 1990s | 0 Mt CO2e | 0.8912 Mt CO2e | 0.8912 Mt CO2e | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) |
| 2000s | 0.1868 Mt CO2e | 1.21 Mt CO2e | 1.02 Mt CO2e | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) |
| 2010s | 0.642 Mt CO2e | 2.52 Mt CO2e | 1.87 Mt CO2e | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) |
| 2020s | 0.5854 Mt CO2e | 4.07 Mt CO2e | 3.49 Mt CO2e | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) emissions from agriculture, Belarus or Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income), at 4.36 Mt CO2e against 0.671 Mt CO2e in Belarus as of 2024.
- What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) emissions from agriculture between Belarus and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- 3.69 Mt CO2e, with Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
- How do Belarus and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) emissions from agriculture?
- Belarus ranks 33rd and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 34th of 109 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A measure of annual emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2), one of the six Kyoto greenhouse gases (GHG), from the agricultural sector. This includes emissions from livestock (IPCC 2006 codes 3.A.1 (enteric fermentation, 3.a.2 (manure management) and crops (IPCC 2006 codes 3.C.1 Emissions from biomass burning, 3.C.2 Liming, 3.C.3 Urea application, 3.C.4 Direct N2O Emissions from managed soils, 3.C.5 Indirect N2O Emissions from managed soils, 3.C.6 Indirect N2O Emissions from manure management, 3.C.7 Rice cultivations). The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5).