Chile vs United Republic of Tanzania: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Agriculture

Chile
0.291 Mt CO2e
in 2024
United Republic of Tanzania
0.2709 Mt CO2e
in 2024
Chile rank
47th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
49th

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Agriculture over time

  • Chile
  • United Republic of Tanzania
00.10.20.30.4197019972024

How they compare

Chile currently reports 0.291 Mt CO2e against 0.2709 Mt CO2e in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 0.0201 Mt CO2e.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 47th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 49th of 110 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 5 and United Republic of Tanzania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0425 Mt CO2e 0.0492 Mt CO2e 0.0068 Mt CO2e United Republic of Tanzania
1980s 0.1024 Mt CO2e 0.0536 Mt CO2e 0.0488 Mt CO2e Chile
1990s 0.3066 Mt CO2e 0.0489 Mt CO2e 0.2576 Mt CO2e Chile
2000s 0.3624 Mt CO2e 0.0469 Mt CO2e 0.3155 Mt CO2e Chile
2010s 0.3026 Mt CO2e 0.1261 Mt CO2e 0.1765 Mt CO2e Chile
2020s 0.3138 Mt CO2e 0.2441 Mt CO2e 0.0697 Mt CO2e Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) emissions from agriculture, Chile or United Republic of Tanzania?
Chile, at 0.291 Mt CO2e against 0.2709 Mt CO2e in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2024.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) emissions from agriculture between Chile and United Republic of Tanzania?
0.0201 Mt CO2e, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and United Republic of Tanzania?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Chile and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) emissions from agriculture?
Chile ranks 47th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 49th of 110 countries.
Where does this data come from?
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs United Republic of Tanzania: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Agriculture. Statizoid, drawing on EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-from-agriculture-mt-co2e/chile/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-from-agriculture-mt-co2e/chile/tanzania/">Chile vs United Republic of Tanzania: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Agriculture</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e)
Unit
Mt CO2e
Source
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
155 places, 8,525 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

A measure of annual emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2), one of the six Kyoto greenhouse gases (GHG), from the agricultural sector. This includes emissions from livestock (IPCC 2006 codes 3.A.1 (enteric fermentation, 3.a.2 (manure management) and crops (IPCC 2006 codes 3.C.1 Emissions from biomass burning, 3.C.2 Liming, 3.C.3 Urea application, 3.C.4 Direct N2O Emissions from managed soils, 3.C.5 Indirect N2O Emissions from managed soils, 3.C.6 Indirect N2O Emissions from manure management, 3.C.7 Rice cultivations). The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5).