Latin America & Caribbean vs Uzbekistan: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Agriculture

Latin America & Caribbean
21.5 Mt CO2e
in 2024
Uzbekistan
1.77 Mt CO2e
in 2024
Latin America & Caribbean rank
19th
Uzbekistan rank
18th

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Agriculture over time

  • Latin America & Caribbean
  • Uzbekistan
0510152025197019972024

How they compare

Latin America & Caribbean currently reports 21.5 Mt CO2e against 1.77 Mt CO2e in Uzbekistan, a difference of 19.73 Mt CO2e.

That makes Latin America & Caribbean's figure about 12.2 times Uzbekistan's.

Across all 55 years both countries report, Latin America & Caribbean has been ahead every year.

Latin America & Caribbean ranks 19th and Uzbekistan ranks 18th of 46 groups.

Latin America & Caribbean has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latin America & Caribbean Uzbekistan Difference Ahead
1970s 4.97 Mt CO2e 2.56 Mt CO2e 2.41 Mt CO2e Latin America & Caribbean
1980s 7.6 Mt CO2e 3.17 Mt CO2e 4.42 Mt CO2e Latin America & Caribbean
1990s 8.98 Mt CO2e 1.57 Mt CO2e 7.41 Mt CO2e Latin America & Caribbean
2000s 12.31 Mt CO2e 1.04 Mt CO2e 11.27 Mt CO2e Latin America & Caribbean
2010s 16.44 Mt CO2e 1.77 Mt CO2e 14.67 Mt CO2e Latin America & Caribbean
2020s 21.38 Mt CO2e 1.81 Mt CO2e 19.58 Mt CO2e Latin America & Caribbean

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) emissions from agriculture, Latin America & Caribbean or Uzbekistan?
Latin America & Caribbean, at 21.5 Mt CO2e against 1.77 Mt CO2e in Uzbekistan as of 2024.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) emissions from agriculture between Latin America & Caribbean and Uzbekistan?
19.73 Mt CO2e, with Latin America & Caribbean ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latin America & Caribbean and Uzbekistan?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Latin America & Caribbean and Uzbekistan rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) emissions from agriculture?
Latin America & Caribbean ranks 19th and Uzbekistan ranks 18th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latin America & Caribbean vs Uzbekistan: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Agriculture. Statizoid, drawing on EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-from-agriculture-mt-co2e/latin-america-and-caribbean/uzbekistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-from-agriculture-mt-co2e/latin-america-and-caribbean/uzbekistan/">Latin America & Caribbean vs Uzbekistan: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Agriculture</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e)
Unit
Mt CO2e
Source
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
155 places, 8,525 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

A measure of annual emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2), one of the six Kyoto greenhouse gases (GHG), from the agricultural sector. This includes emissions from livestock (IPCC 2006 codes 3.A.1 (enteric fermentation, 3.a.2 (manure management) and crops (IPCC 2006 codes 3.C.1 Emissions from biomass burning, 3.C.2 Liming, 3.C.3 Urea application, 3.C.4 Direct N2O Emissions from managed soils, 3.C.5 Indirect N2O Emissions from managed soils, 3.C.6 Indirect N2O Emissions from manure management, 3.C.7 Rice cultivations). The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5).