Botswana vs Sao Tome and Principe: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e)

Botswana
1.31 % change on previous year
in 2024
Sao Tome and Principe
1.33 % change on previous year
in 2024
Botswana rank
140th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
139th

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e) over time

  • Botswana
  • Sao Tome and Principe
-50050100150197119972024

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 1.33 % change on previous year against 1.31 % change on previous year in Botswana, a difference of 0.02 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 28 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Botswana ranks 140th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 139th of 193 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 5 and Sao Tome and Principe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1970s 4.99 % change on previous year 2.34 % change on previous year 2.64 % change on previous year Botswana
1980s 13.56 % change on previous year 2.02 % change on previous year 11.54 % change on previous year Botswana
1990s 13.22 % change on previous year 2.52 % change on previous year 10.71 % change on previous year Botswana
2000s 4.91 % change on previous year 2.62 % change on previous year 2.29 % change on previous year Botswana
2010s -5.08 % change on previous year 4.87 % change on previous year 9.95 % change on previous year Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 1.91 % change on previous year -1.65 % change on previous year 3.56 % change on previous year Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) emissions from building (energy) (mt co2e), Botswana or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 1.33 % change on previous year against 1.31 % change on previous year in Botswana as of 2024.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) emissions from building (energy) (mt co2e) between Botswana and Sao Tome and Principe?
0.02 % change on previous year, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Sao Tome and Principe?
54 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2024.
How do Botswana and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) emissions from building (energy) (mt co2e)?
Botswana ranks 140th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 139th of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Sao Tome and Principe: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-from-building-energy-mt-co2e-annual-growth-rate/botswana/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-from-building-energy-mt-co2e-annual-growth-rate/botswana/sao-tome-and-principe/">Botswana vs Sao Tome and Principe: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 12,899 data points, 1971–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.