Norway vs Trinidad and Tobago: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e)

Norway
-0.6479 % change on previous year
in 2024
Trinidad and Tobago
-0.3321 % change on previous year
in 2024
Norway rank
169th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
167th

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e) over time

  • Norway
  • Trinidad and Tobago
-50050100150197119972024

How they compare

Trinidad and Tobago currently reports -0.3321 % change on previous year against -0.6479 % change on previous year in Norway, a difference of 0.3158 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 30 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

Norway ranks 169th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 167th of 193 countries.

Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Norway Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1970s -1.53 % change on previous year 3.95 % change on previous year 5.47 % change on previous year Trinidad and Tobago
1980s -5.45 % change on previous year 1.32 % change on previous year 6.77 % change on previous year Trinidad and Tobago
1990s 1.79 % change on previous year 4.31 % change on previous year 2.52 % change on previous year Trinidad and Tobago
2000s -0.7453 % change on previous year 17.64 % change on previous year 18.39 % change on previous year Trinidad and Tobago
2010s -3.08 % change on previous year -2.29 % change on previous year 0.7992 % change on previous year Trinidad and Tobago
2020s 0.917 % change on previous year 1.56 % change on previous year 0.6464 % change on previous year Trinidad and Tobago

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) emissions from building (energy) (mt co2e), Norway or Trinidad and Tobago?
Trinidad and Tobago, at -0.3321 % change on previous year against -0.6479 % change on previous year in Norway as of 2024.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) emissions from building (energy) (mt co2e) between Norway and Trinidad and Tobago?
0.3158 % change on previous year, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Trinidad and Tobago?
54 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2024.
How do Norway and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) emissions from building (energy) (mt co2e)?
Norway ranks 169th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 167th of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Norway vs Trinidad and Tobago: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-from-building-energy-mt-co2e-annual-growth-rate/norway/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-from-building-energy-mt-co2e-annual-growth-rate/norway/trinidad-and-tobago/">Norway vs Trinidad and Tobago: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 12,899 data points, 1971–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.