How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and Lithuania?

55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

French Polynesia vs Lithuania: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per

French Polynesia

0 Mt CO2e per person

in 2024

Lithuania

0 Mt CO2e per person

in 2024

French Polynesia rank

53rd

Lithuania rank

55th

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per over time

French Polynesia
Lithuania

How they compare

French Polynesia currently reports 0 Mt CO2e per person against 0 Mt CO2e per person in Lithuania, a difference of 0 Mt CO2e per person.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Lithuania ahead.

French Polynesia ranks 53rd and Lithuania ranks 55th of 193 countries.

Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	French Polynesia	Lithuania	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0 Mt CO2e per person	0 Mt CO2e per person	0 Mt CO2e per person	Lithuania
1980s	0 Mt CO2e per person	0 Mt CO2e per person	0 Mt CO2e per person	Lithuania
1990s	0 Mt CO2e per person	0 Mt CO2e per person	0 Mt CO2e per person	Lithuania
2000s	0 Mt CO2e per person	0 Mt CO2e per person	0 Mt CO2e per person	Lithuania
2010s	0 Mt CO2e per person	0 Mt CO2e per person	0 Mt CO2e per person	Lithuania
2020s	0 Mt CO2e per person	0 Mt CO2e per person	0 Mt CO2e per person	Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) emissions from building (energy) (mt co2e), per, French Polynesia or Lithuania?: French Polynesia, at 0 Mt CO2e per person against 0 Mt CO2e per person in Lithuania as of 2024.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) emissions from building (energy) (mt co2e), per between French Polynesia and Lithuania?: 0 Mt CO2e per person, with French Polynesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and Lithuania?: 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do French Polynesia and Lithuania rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) emissions from building (energy) (mt co2e), per?: French Polynesia ranks 53rd and Lithuania ranks 55th of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

French Polynesia vs Lithuania: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-from-building-energy-mt-co2e-per-capita/french-polynesia/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-from-building-energy-mt-co2e-per-capita/french-polynesia/lithuania/">French Polynesia vs Lithuania: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per capita
Unit: Mt CO2e per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 240 places, 13,200 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 21 September 2026

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.