East Asia & Pacific vs Japan: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per

East Asia & Pacific
0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre
in 2023
Japan
0.0003 Mt CO2e per square kilometre
in 2023
East Asia & Pacific rank
13th
Japan rank
14th

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per over time

  • East Asia & Pacific
  • Japan
000000.001197019962023

How they compare

Japan currently reports 0.0003 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific, a difference of 0.0003 Mt CO2e per square kilometre.

That makes Japan's figure about 8.3 times East Asia & Pacific's.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.

East Asia & Pacific ranks 13th and Japan ranks 14th of 47 groups.

Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific Japan Difference Ahead
1970s 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0.0003 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0.0003 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Japan
1980s 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0.0004 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0.0003 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Japan
1990s 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0.0004 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0.0004 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Japan
2000s 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0.0005 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0.0004 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Japan
2010s 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0.0004 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0.0003 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Japan
2020s 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0.0003 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0.0003 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Japan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) emissions from building (energy) (mt co2e), per, East Asia & Pacific or Japan?
Japan, at 0.0003 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific as of 2023.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) emissions from building (energy) (mt co2e), per between East Asia & Pacific and Japan?
0.0003 Mt CO2e per square kilometre, with Japan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific and Japan?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do East Asia & Pacific and Japan rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) emissions from building (energy) (mt co2e), per?
East Asia & Pacific ranks 13th and Japan ranks 14th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific vs Japan: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-from-building-energy-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/east-asia-and-pacific/japan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-from-building-energy-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/east-asia-and-pacific/japan/">East Asia & Pacific vs Japan: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre
Unit
Mt CO2e per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 12,327 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.