Equatorial Guinea vs Zimbabwe: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per

Equatorial Guinea
0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
138th
Zimbabwe rank
139th

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Zimbabwe
00000197019962023

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 138th and Zimbabwe ranks 139th of 193 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1970s 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1980s 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2020s 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) emissions from building (energy) (mt co2e), per, Equatorial Guinea or Zimbabwe?
Equatorial Guinea, at 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) emissions from building (energy) (mt co2e), per between Equatorial Guinea and Zimbabwe?
0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Zimbabwe?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Zimbabwe rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) emissions from building (energy) (mt co2e), per?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 138th and Zimbabwe ranks 139th of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Zimbabwe: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-from-building-energy-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-from-building-energy-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/zimbabwe/">Equatorial Guinea vs Zimbabwe: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre
Unit
Mt CO2e per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 12,327 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.