Low income vs United States: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per

Low income
0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre
in 2023
United States
0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre
in 2023
Low income rank
45th
United States rank
48th

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per over time

  • Low income
  • United States
000000197019962023

How they compare

United States currently reports 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Low income, a difference of 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre.

That makes United States's figure about 35.4 times Low income's.

Across all 54 years both countries report, United States has been ahead every year.

Low income ranks 45th and United States ranks 48th of 47 groups.

United States has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low income United States Difference Ahead
1970s 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre United States
1980s 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre United States
1990s 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre United States
2000s 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre United States
2010s 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre United States
2020s 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre United States

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) emissions from building (energy) (mt co2e), per, Low income or United States?
United States, at 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Low income as of 2023.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) emissions from building (energy) (mt co2e), per between Low income and United States?
0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre, with United States ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low income and United States?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Low income and United States rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) emissions from building (energy) (mt co2e), per?
Low income ranks 45th and United States ranks 48th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low income vs United States: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-from-building-energy-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/low-income/united-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-from-building-energy-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/low-income/united-states/">Low income vs United States: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre
Unit
Mt CO2e per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 12,327 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.