How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Eswatini?

55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Costa Rica vs Eswatini: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per

Costa Rica

0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Eswatini

0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Costa Rica rank

175th

Eswatini rank

174th

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per over time

Costa Rica
Eswatini

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP against 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP in Costa Rica, a difference of 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Eswatini ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 175th and Eswatini ranks 174th of 191 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Costa Rica	Eswatini	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP	0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP	0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP	Eswatini
1980s	0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP	0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP	0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP	Eswatini
1990s	0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP	0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP	0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP	Eswatini
2000s	0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP	0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP	0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP	Eswatini
2010s	0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP	0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP	0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP	Eswatini
2020s	0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP	0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP	0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP	Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) emissions from building (energy) (mt co2e), per, Costa Rica or Eswatini?: Eswatini, at 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP against 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP in Costa Rica as of 2024.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) emissions from building (energy) (mt co2e), per between Costa Rica and Eswatini?: 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Eswatini?: 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Costa Rica and Eswatini rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) emissions from building (energy) (mt co2e), per?: Costa Rica ranks 175th and Eswatini ranks 174th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Eswatini: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-from-building-energy-mt-co2e-per-unit-of-gdp/costa-rica/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-from-building-energy-mt-co2e-per-unit-of-gdp/costa-rica/eswatini/">Costa Rica vs Eswatini: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per unit of GDP
Unit: Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 238 places, 12,139 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 21 September 2026

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.