How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Sri Lanka?

55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Guatemala vs Sri Lanka: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per

Guatemala

0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Sri Lanka

0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Guatemala rank

136th

Sri Lanka rank

135th

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per over time

Guatemala
Sri Lanka

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP against 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP in Guatemala, a difference of 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Sri Lanka ahead.

Guatemala ranks 136th and Sri Lanka ranks 135th of 191 countries.

Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Guatemala	Sri Lanka	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP	0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP	0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP	Sri Lanka
1980s	0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP	0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP	0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP	Sri Lanka
1990s	0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP	0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP	0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP	Sri Lanka
2000s	0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP	0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP	0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP	Sri Lanka
2010s	0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP	0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP	0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP	Sri Lanka
2020s	0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP	0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP	0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP	Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) emissions from building (energy) (mt co2e), per, Guatemala or Sri Lanka?: Sri Lanka, at 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP against 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP in Guatemala as of 2024.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) emissions from building (energy) (mt co2e), per between Guatemala and Sri Lanka?: 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Sri Lanka?: 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Guatemala and Sri Lanka rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) emissions from building (energy) (mt co2e), per?: Guatemala ranks 136th and Sri Lanka ranks 135th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Sri Lanka: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-from-building-energy-mt-co2e-per-unit-of-gdp/guatemala/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-from-building-energy-mt-co2e-per-unit-of-gdp/guatemala/sri-lanka/">Guatemala vs Sri Lanka: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per unit of GDP
Unit: Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 238 places, 12,139 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 21 September 2026

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.