How many years of comparable data are there for Netherlands and Zambia?

55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Netherlands vs Zambia: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per

Netherlands

0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Zambia

0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Netherlands rank

104th

Zambia rank

103rd

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per over time

Netherlands
Zambia

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP against 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP in Netherlands, a difference of 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Netherlands ahead.

Netherlands ranks 104th and Zambia ranks 103rd of 191 countries.

Netherlands has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Netherlands	Zambia	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP	0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP	0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP	Netherlands
1980s	0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP	0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP	0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP	Netherlands
1990s	0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP	0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP	0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP	Netherlands
2000s	0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP	0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP	0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP	Netherlands
2010s	0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP	0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP	0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP	Netherlands
2020s	0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP	0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP	0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP	Netherlands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) emissions from building (energy) (mt co2e), per, Netherlands or Zambia?: Zambia, at 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP against 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP in Netherlands as of 2024.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) emissions from building (energy) (mt co2e), per between Netherlands and Zambia?: 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Netherlands and Zambia?: 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Netherlands and Zambia rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) emissions from building (energy) (mt co2e), per?: Netherlands ranks 104th and Zambia ranks 103rd of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Netherlands vs Zambia: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-from-building-energy-mt-co2e-per-unit-of-gdp/netherlands/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-from-building-energy-mt-co2e-per-unit-of-gdp/netherlands/zambia/">Netherlands vs Zambia: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per unit of GDP
Unit: Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 238 places, 12,139 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 21 September 2026

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.