How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Lithuania?

32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Fugitive Emissions (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Ecuador vs Lithuania: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Fugitive Emissions (Energy) (Mt)

Ecuador

0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre

in 2023

Lithuania

0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre

in 2023

Ecuador rank

46th

Lithuania rank

43rd

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Fugitive Emissions (Energy) (Mt) over time

Ecuador
Lithuania

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Lithuania ahead.

Ecuador ranks 46th and Lithuania ranks 43rd of 190 countries.

Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Ecuador	Lithuania	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Lithuania
2000s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Lithuania
2010s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Lithuania
2020s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) emissions from fugitive emissions (energy) (mt), Ecuador or Lithuania?: Lithuania, at 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) emissions from fugitive emissions (energy) (mt) between Ecuador and Lithuania?: 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Lithuania?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Lithuania rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) emissions from fugitive emissions (energy) (mt)?: Ecuador ranks 46th and Lithuania ranks 43rd of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Fugitive Emissions (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Lithuania: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Fugitive Emissions (Energy) (Mt). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-from-fugitive-emissions-energy-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-from-fugitive-emissions-energy-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/lithuania/">Ecuador vs Lithuania: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Fugitive Emissions (Energy) (Mt)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Fugitive Emissions (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre
Unit: Mt CO2e per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 237 places, 12,165 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed: 21 September 2026

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Fugitive Emissions (Energy) (Mt CO2e) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.