How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Sweden?

54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Industrial Combustion (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Ecuador vs Sweden: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Industrial Combustion (Energy)

Ecuador

0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre

in 2023

Sweden

0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre

in 2023

Ecuador rank

102nd

Sweden rank

105th

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Industrial Combustion (Energy) over time

Ecuador
Sweden

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Sweden, a difference of 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Sweden ahead.

Ecuador ranks 102nd and Sweden ranks 105th of 193 countries.

Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Ecuador	Sweden	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Sweden
1980s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Sweden
1990s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Sweden
2000s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Sweden
2010s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Sweden
2020s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) emissions from industrial combustion (energy), Ecuador or Sweden?: Ecuador, at 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Sweden as of 2023.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) emissions from industrial combustion (energy) between Ecuador and Sweden?: 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Sweden?: 54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Sweden rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) emissions from industrial combustion (energy)?: Ecuador ranks 102nd and Sweden ranks 105th of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Industrial Combustion (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Sweden: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Industrial Combustion (Energy). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-from-industrial-combustion-energy-mt-co2e-per-square/ecuador/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-from-industrial-combustion-energy-mt-co2e-per-square/ecuador/sweden/">Ecuador vs Sweden: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Industrial Combustion (Energy)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Industrial Combustion (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre
Unit: Mt CO2e per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 240 places, 12,327 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed: 20 September 2026

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Industrial Combustion (Energy) (Mt CO2e) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.