How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Sudan?

12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Industrial Combustion (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Iceland vs Sudan: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Industrial Combustion (Energy)

Iceland

0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre

in 2023

Sudan

0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre

in 2023

Iceland rank

180th

Sudan rank

179th

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Industrial Combustion (Energy) over time

Iceland
Sudan

How they compare

Sudan currently reports 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Iceland, a difference of 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Iceland ahead.

Iceland ranks 180th and Sudan ranks 179th of 193 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 1 and Sudan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Iceland	Sudan	Difference	Ahead
2010s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Iceland
2020s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) emissions from industrial combustion (energy), Iceland or Sudan?: Sudan, at 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Iceland as of 2023.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) emissions from industrial combustion (energy) between Iceland and Sudan?: 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre, with Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Sudan?: 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
How do Iceland and Sudan rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) emissions from industrial combustion (energy)?: Iceland ranks 180th and Sudan ranks 179th of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Industrial Combustion (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Sudan: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Industrial Combustion (Energy). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-from-industrial-combustion-energy-mt-co2e-per-square/iceland/sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-from-industrial-combustion-energy-mt-co2e-per-square/iceland/sudan/">Iceland vs Sudan: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Industrial Combustion (Energy)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Industrial Combustion (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre
Unit: Mt CO2e per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 240 places, 12,327 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed: 20 September 2026

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Industrial Combustion (Energy) (Mt CO2e) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.