Rwanda vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Industrial Combustion (Energy)

Rwanda
0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre
in 2023
Turks and Caicos Islands
0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda rank
111th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
110th

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Industrial Combustion (Energy) over time

  • Rwanda
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
0000197019962023

How they compare

Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Rwanda ahead.

Rwanda ranks 111th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 110th of 193 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 5 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1970s 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Rwanda
1980s 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Rwanda
1990s 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Rwanda
2000s 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Rwanda
2010s 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Rwanda
2020s 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) emissions from industrial combustion (energy), Rwanda or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Turks and Caicos Islands, at 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) emissions from industrial combustion (energy) between Rwanda and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Turks and Caicos Islands?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Rwanda and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) emissions from industrial combustion (energy)?
Rwanda ranks 111th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 110th of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Industrial Combustion (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Industrial Combustion (Energy). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-from-industrial-combustion-energy-mt-co2e-per-square/rwanda/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-from-industrial-combustion-energy-mt-co2e-per-square/rwanda/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Rwanda vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Industrial Combustion (Energy)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Industrial Combustion (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre
Unit
Mt CO2e per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 12,327 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Industrial Combustion (Energy) (Mt CO2e) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.