Caribbean Small States vs China: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Industrial Processes (Mt CO2e)

Caribbean Small States
0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre
in 2023
China
0.0002 Mt CO2e per square kilometre
in 2023
Caribbean Small States rank
14th
China rank
15th

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Industrial Processes (Mt CO2e) over time

  • Caribbean Small States
  • China
0000197019962023

How they compare

China currently reports 0.0002 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Caribbean Small States, a difference of 0.0002 Mt CO2e per square kilometre.

That makes China's figure about 5.3 times Caribbean Small States's.

Across all 54 years both countries report, China has been ahead every year.

Caribbean Small States ranks 14th and China ranks 15th of 47 groups.

China has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Caribbean Small States China Difference Ahead
1970s 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre China
1980s 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre China
1990s 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre China
2000s 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre China
2010s 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre China
2020s 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0.0002 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) emissions from industrial processes (mt co2e), Caribbean Small States or China?
China, at 0.0002 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Caribbean Small States as of 2023.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) emissions from industrial processes (mt co2e) between Caribbean Small States and China?
0.0002 Mt CO2e per square kilometre, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Caribbean Small States and China?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Caribbean Small States and China rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) emissions from industrial processes (mt co2e)?
Caribbean Small States ranks 14th and China ranks 15th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Industrial Processes (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Caribbean Small States vs China: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Industrial Processes (Mt CO2e). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-from-industrial-processes-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/caribbean-small-states/china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-from-industrial-processes-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/caribbean-small-states/china/">Caribbean Small States vs China: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Industrial Processes (Mt CO2e)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Industrial Processes (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre
Unit
Mt CO2e per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
250 places, 12,804 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Industrial Processes (Mt CO2e) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.