Bahamas, The vs Eswatini, Kingdom of: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Industrial Processes

Bahamas, The
0.0044 Mt CO2e
in 2024
Eswatini, Kingdom of
0.0046 Mt CO2e
in 2024
Bahamas, The rank
165th
Eswatini, Kingdom of rank
164th

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Industrial Processes over time

  • Bahamas, The
  • Eswatini, Kingdom of
00.10.20.30.40.5197019972024

How they compare

Eswatini, Kingdom of currently reports 0.0046 Mt CO2e against 0.0044 Mt CO2e in Bahamas, The, a difference of 0.0002 Mt CO2e.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Bahamas, The ahead.

Bahamas, The ranks 165th and Eswatini, Kingdom of ranks 164th of 203 countries.

Bahamas, The has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas, The Eswatini, Kingdom of Difference Ahead
1970s 0.3113 Mt CO2e 0.0021 Mt CO2e 0.3092 Mt CO2e Bahamas, The
1980s 0.0339 Mt CO2e 0.0025 Mt CO2e 0.0314 Mt CO2e Bahamas, The
1990s 0.0069 Mt CO2e 0.003 Mt CO2e 0.0039 Mt CO2e Bahamas, The
2000s 0.007 Mt CO2e 0.0032 Mt CO2e 0.0038 Mt CO2e Bahamas, The
2010s 0.0065 Mt CO2e 0.0035 Mt CO2e 0.003 Mt CO2e Bahamas, The
2020s 0.0043 Mt CO2e 0.0042 Mt CO2e 0 Mt CO2e Bahamas, The

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) emissions from industrial processes, Bahamas, The or Eswatini, Kingdom of?
Eswatini, Kingdom of, at 0.0046 Mt CO2e against 0.0044 Mt CO2e in Bahamas, The as of 2024.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) emissions from industrial processes between Bahamas, The and Eswatini, Kingdom of?
0.0002 Mt CO2e, with Eswatini, Kingdom of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas, The and Eswatini, Kingdom of?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Bahamas, The and Eswatini, Kingdom of rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) emissions from industrial processes?
Bahamas, The ranks 165th and Eswatini, Kingdom of ranks 164th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Industrial Processes (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas, The vs Eswatini, Kingdom of: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Industrial Processes. Statizoid, drawing on EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-from-industrial-processes-mt-co2e/bahamas-the/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-from-industrial-processes-mt-co2e/bahamas-the/eswatini/">Bahamas, The vs Eswatini, Kingdom of: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Industrial Processes</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Industrial Processes (Mt CO2e)
Unit
Mt CO2e
Source
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
250 places, 13,750 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

A measure of annual emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2), one of the six Kyoto greenhouse gases (GHG), from industrial processes including IPCC 2006 codes 2.A.1 Cement production, 2.A.2 Lime production, 2.A.3 Glass Production, 2.A.4 Other Process Uses of Carbonates, 2.B Chemical Industry, 2.C Metal Industry, 2.D Non-Energy Products from Fuels and Solvent Use, 2.E Electronics Industry, 2.F Product Uses as Substitutes for Ozone Depleting Substances, 2.G Other Product Manufacture and Use and 5.A Indirect N2O emissions from the atmospheric deposition of nitrogen in NOx and NH3. The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5).