Small states vs Uzbekistan: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Industrial Processes

Small states
16.08 Mt CO2e
in 2024
Uzbekistan
10.17 Mt CO2e
in 2024
Small states rank
42nd
Uzbekistan rank
42nd

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Industrial Processes over time

  • Small states
  • Uzbekistan
5101520197019972024

How they compare

Small states currently reports 16.08 Mt CO2e against 10.17 Mt CO2e in Uzbekistan, a difference of 5.91 Mt CO2e.

That makes Small states's figure about 1.6 times Uzbekistan's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Uzbekistan ahead.

Small states ranks 42nd and Uzbekistan ranks 42nd of 45 groups.

Across the 6 decades both report, Small states averaged higher in 4 and Uzbekistan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Small states Uzbekistan Difference Ahead
1970s 3.3 Mt CO2e 5.64 Mt CO2e 2.34 Mt CO2e Uzbekistan
1980s 5.23 Mt CO2e 6.45 Mt CO2e 1.22 Mt CO2e Uzbekistan
1990s 8.11 Mt CO2e 5.2 Mt CO2e 2.91 Mt CO2e Small states
2000s 17.21 Mt CO2e 4.84 Mt CO2e 12.38 Mt CO2e Small states
2010s 19.25 Mt CO2e 6.96 Mt CO2e 12.29 Mt CO2e Small states
2020s 17.09 Mt CO2e 9.7 Mt CO2e 7.39 Mt CO2e Small states

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) emissions from industrial processes, Small states or Uzbekistan?
Small states, at 16.08 Mt CO2e against 10.17 Mt CO2e in Uzbekistan as of 2024.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) emissions from industrial processes between Small states and Uzbekistan?
5.91 Mt CO2e, with Small states ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Small states and Uzbekistan?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Small states and Uzbekistan rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) emissions from industrial processes?
Small states ranks 42nd and Uzbekistan ranks 42nd of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Industrial Processes (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Small states vs Uzbekistan: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Industrial Processes. Statizoid, drawing on EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-from-industrial-processes-mt-co2e/small-states/uzbekistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-from-industrial-processes-mt-co2e/small-states/uzbekistan/">Small states vs Uzbekistan: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Industrial Processes</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Industrial Processes (Mt CO2e)
Unit
Mt CO2e
Source
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
250 places, 13,750 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

A measure of annual emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2), one of the six Kyoto greenhouse gases (GHG), from industrial processes including IPCC 2006 codes 2.A.1 Cement production, 2.A.2 Lime production, 2.A.3 Glass Production, 2.A.4 Other Process Uses of Carbonates, 2.B Chemical Industry, 2.C Metal Industry, 2.D Non-Energy Products from Fuels and Solvent Use, 2.E Electronics Industry, 2.F Product Uses as Substitutes for Ozone Depleting Substances, 2.G Other Product Manufacture and Use and 5.A Indirect N2O emissions from the atmospheric deposition of nitrogen in NOx and NH3. The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5).