Belarus vs Kiribati: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Transport (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per

Belarus
0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre
in 2023
Kiribati
0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
102nd
Kiribati rank
104th

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Transport (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per over time

  • Belarus
  • Kiribati
0000197019962023

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Kiribati, a difference of 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 102nd and Kiribati ranks 104th of 194 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Kiribati Difference Ahead
1990s 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Belarus
2000s 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Belarus
2010s 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Belarus
2020s 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) emissions from transport (energy) (mt co2e), per, Belarus or Kiribati?
Belarus, at 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Kiribati as of 2023.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) emissions from transport (energy) (mt co2e), per between Belarus and Kiribati?
0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Kiribati?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Kiribati rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) emissions from transport (energy) (mt co2e), per?
Belarus ranks 102nd and Kiribati ranks 104th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Transport (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Kiribati: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Transport (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-from-transport-energy-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/belarus/kiribati/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-from-transport-energy-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/belarus/kiribati/">Belarus vs Kiribati: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Transport (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Transport (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre
Unit
Mt CO2e per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
241 places, 12,381 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Transport (Energy) (Mt CO2e) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.