Euro area vs Hong Kong: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Transport (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per

Euro area
0.0002 Mt CO2e per square kilometre
in 2023
Hong Kong
0.0071 Mt CO2e per square kilometre
in 2023
Euro area rank
1st
Hong Kong rank
4th

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Transport (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per over time

  • Euro area
  • Hong Kong
00.0050.010.015197019962023

How they compare

Hong Kong currently reports 0.0071 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0.0002 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Euro area, a difference of 0.0069 Mt CO2e per square kilometre.

That makes Hong Kong's figure about 32.0 times Euro area's.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Hong Kong has been ahead every year.

Euro area ranks 1st and Hong Kong ranks 4th of 47 groups.

Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Euro area Hong Kong Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0.0016 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0.0015 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Hong Kong
1980s 0.0002 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0.0033 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0.0032 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Hong Kong
1990s 0.0002 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0.0078 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0.0076 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Hong Kong
2000s 0.0002 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0.0069 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0.0066 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Hong Kong
2010s 0.0002 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0.0068 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0.0066 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Hong Kong
2020s 0.0002 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0.0072 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0.007 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Hong Kong

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) emissions from transport (energy) (mt co2e), per, Euro area or Hong Kong?
Hong Kong, at 0.0071 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0.0002 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Euro area as of 2023.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) emissions from transport (energy) (mt co2e), per between Euro area and Hong Kong?
0.0069 Mt CO2e per square kilometre, with Hong Kong ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Euro area and Hong Kong?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Euro area and Hong Kong rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) emissions from transport (energy) (mt co2e), per?
Euro area ranks 1st and Hong Kong ranks 4th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Transport (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Euro area vs Hong Kong: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Transport (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-from-transport-energy-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/euro-area/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-from-transport-energy-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/euro-area/hong-kong-sar-china/">Euro area vs Hong Kong: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Transport (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Transport (Energy) (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre
Unit
Mt CO2e per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
241 places, 12,381 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Transport (Energy) (Mt CO2e) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.