Hong Kong, China vs Jordan: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Transport (Energy)

Hong Kong, China
8.41 Mt CO2e
in 2024
Jordan
7.97 Mt CO2e
in 2024
Hong Kong, China rank
78th
Jordan rank
80th

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Transport (Energy) over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Jordan
051015197019972024

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 8.41 Mt CO2e against 7.97 Mt CO2e in Jordan, a difference of 0.44 Mt CO2e.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 1.1 times Jordan's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.

Hong Kong, China ranks 78th and Jordan ranks 80th of 194 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Hong Kong, China averaged higher in 4 and Jordan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Jordan Difference Ahead
1970s 1.65 Mt CO2e 0.9904 Mt CO2e 0.6553 Mt CO2e Hong Kong, China
1980s 3.32 Mt CO2e 2.43 Mt CO2e 0.8891 Mt CO2e Hong Kong, China
1990s 8.04 Mt CO2e 2.93 Mt CO2e 5.11 Mt CO2e Hong Kong, China
2000s 7.2 Mt CO2e 4.38 Mt CO2e 2.82 Mt CO2e Hong Kong, China
2010s 7.18 Mt CO2e 7.43 Mt CO2e 0.2462 Mt CO2e Jordan
2020s 7.74 Mt CO2e 7.76 Mt CO2e 0.0232 Mt CO2e Jordan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) emissions from transport (energy), Hong Kong, China or Jordan?
Hong Kong, China, at 8.41 Mt CO2e against 7.97 Mt CO2e in Jordan as of 2024.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) emissions from transport (energy) between Hong Kong, China and Jordan?
0.44 Mt CO2e, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Jordan?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Hong Kong, China and Jordan rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) emissions from transport (energy)?
Hong Kong, China ranks 78th and Jordan ranks 80th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Transport (Energy) (Mt CO2e). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Jordan: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Transport (Energy). Statizoid, drawing on EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-from-transport-energy-mt-co2e/hong-kong-sar-china/jordan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-from-transport-energy-mt-co2e/hong-kong-sar-china/jordan/">Hong Kong, China vs Jordan: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Transport (Energy)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Transport (Energy) (Mt CO2e)
Unit
Mt CO2e
Source
EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
241 places, 13,255 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

A measure of annual emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2), one of the six Kyoto greenhouse gases (GHG), from the transportation sector (subsector of the energy sector) including IPCC 2006 codes 1.A.3.a Civil Aviation, 1.A.3.b_noRES Road Transportation no resuspension, 1.A.3.c Railways, 1.A.3.d Water-borne Navigation, 1.A.3.e Other Transportation. The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5).