Equatorial Guinea vs Eswatini: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e)

Equatorial Guinea
1.3 % change on previous year
in 2024
Eswatini
1.46 % change on previous year
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea rank
122nd
Eswatini rank
119th

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e) over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Eswatini
-50050100197119972024

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 1.46 % change on previous year against 1.3 % change on previous year in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.16 % change on previous year.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 24 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Eswatini ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 122nd and Eswatini ranks 119th of 201 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 3 and Eswatini in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Eswatini Difference Ahead
1970s 10.4 % change on previous year 12.47 % change on previous year 2.06 % change on previous year Eswatini
1980s 3.12 % change on previous year 2.72 % change on previous year 0.3974 % change on previous year Equatorial Guinea
1990s 9.39 % change on previous year 1.02 % change on previous year 8.37 % change on previous year Equatorial Guinea
2000s 10.27 % change on previous year -1.73 % change on previous year 12 % change on previous year Equatorial Guinea
2010s -0.5279 % change on previous year 1.2 % change on previous year 1.73 % change on previous year Eswatini
2020s -1.12 % change on previous year -0.4025 % change on previous year 0.717 % change on previous year Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e), Equatorial Guinea or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 1.46 % change on previous year against 1.3 % change on previous year in Equatorial Guinea as of 2024.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e) between Equatorial Guinea and Eswatini?
0.16 % change on previous year, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Eswatini?
53 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2024.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Eswatini rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e)?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 122nd and Eswatini ranks 119th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Eswatini: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-total-excluding-lulucf-mt-co2e-annual-growth-rate/equatorial-guinea/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-total-excluding-lulucf-mt-co2e-annual-growth-rate/equatorial-guinea/eswatini/">Equatorial Guinea vs Eswatini: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
248 places, 13,350 data points, 1971–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.