How many years of comparable data are there for China and IDA & IBRD total?

55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

China vs IDA & IBRD total: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e)

China

0 Mt CO2e per person

in 2024

IDA & IBRD total

0 Mt CO2e per person

in 2024

China rank

22nd

IDA & IBRD total rank

23rd

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e) over time

China
IDA & IBRD total

How they compare

China currently reports 0 Mt CO2e per person against 0 Mt CO2e per person in IDA & IBRD total, a difference of 0 Mt CO2e per person.

That makes China's figure about 2.4 times IDA & IBRD total's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was IDA & IBRD total ahead.

China ranks 22nd and IDA & IBRD total ranks 23rd of 203 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, China averaged higher in 4 and IDA & IBRD total in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	China	IDA & IBRD total	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0 Mt CO2e per person	0 Mt CO2e per person	0 Mt CO2e per person	IDA & IBRD total
1980s	0 Mt CO2e per person	0 Mt CO2e per person	0 Mt CO2e per person	IDA & IBRD total
1990s	0 Mt CO2e per person	0 Mt CO2e per person	0 Mt CO2e per person	China
2000s	0 Mt CO2e per person	0 Mt CO2e per person	0 Mt CO2e per person	China
2010s	0 Mt CO2e per person	0 Mt CO2e per person	0 Mt CO2e per person	China
2020s	0 Mt CO2e per person	0 Mt CO2e per person	0 Mt CO2e per person	China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e), China or IDA & IBRD total?: China, at 0 Mt CO2e per person against 0 Mt CO2e per person in IDA & IBRD total as of 2024.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e) between China and IDA & IBRD total?: 0 Mt CO2e per person, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and IDA & IBRD total?: 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do China and IDA & IBRD total rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e)?: China ranks 22nd and IDA & IBRD total ranks 23rd of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs IDA & IBRD total: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-total-excluding-lulucf-mt-co2e-per-capita/china/ida-and-ibrd-total/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-total-excluding-lulucf-mt-co2e-per-capita/china/ida-and-ibrd-total/">China vs IDA & IBRD total: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per capita
Unit: Mt CO2e per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 250 places, 13,750 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 20 September 2026

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.