How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Zambia?

54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Belize vs Zambia: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e)

Belize

0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre

in 2023

Zambia

0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre

in 2023

Belize rank

174th

Zambia rank

176th

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e) over time

Belize
Zambia

How they compare

Belize currently reports 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Zambia, a difference of 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre.

That makes Belize's figure about 1.1 times Zambia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Zambia ahead.

Belize ranks 174th and Zambia ranks 176th of 203 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Belize averaged higher in 4 and Zambia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Belize	Zambia	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Zambia
1980s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Zambia
1990s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Belize
2000s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Belize
2010s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Belize
2020s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Belize

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e), Belize or Zambia?: Belize, at 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Zambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e) between Belize and Zambia?: 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre, with Belize ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Zambia?: 54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Belize and Zambia rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e)?: Belize ranks 174th and Zambia ranks 176th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belize vs Zambia: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-total-excluding-lulucf-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/belize/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-total-excluding-lulucf-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/belize/zambia/">Belize vs Zambia: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre
Unit: Mt CO2e per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 250 places, 12,804 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed: 20 September 2026

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.