How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Congo?

54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Bolivia vs Congo: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e)

Bolivia

0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre

in 2023

Congo

0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre

in 2023

Bolivia rank

161st

Congo rank

159th

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e) over time

Bolivia
Congo

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Bolivia, a difference of 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Congo ahead.

Bolivia ranks 161st and Congo ranks 159th of 203 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Bolivia averaged higher in 1 and Congo in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Bolivia	Congo	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Congo
1980s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Congo
1990s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Congo
2000s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Congo
2010s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Bolivia
2020s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e), Bolivia or Congo?: Congo, at 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Bolivia as of 2023.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e) between Bolivia and Congo?: 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Congo?: 54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Bolivia and Congo rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e)?: Bolivia ranks 161st and Congo ranks 159th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bolivia vs Congo: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-total-excluding-lulucf-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/bolivia/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-total-excluding-lulucf-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/bolivia/congo-rep/">Bolivia vs Congo: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre
Unit: Mt CO2e per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 250 places, 12,804 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed: 20 September 2026

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.