How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Iceland?

54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Congo vs Iceland: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e)

Congo

0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre

in 2023

Iceland

0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre

in 2023

Congo rank

159th

Iceland rank

157th

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e) over time

Congo
Iceland

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Congo, a difference of 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre.

That makes Iceland's figure about 1.4 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Iceland ahead.

Congo ranks 159th and Iceland ranks 157th of 203 countries.

Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Congo	Iceland	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Iceland
1980s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Iceland
1990s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Iceland
2000s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Iceland
2010s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Iceland
2020s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e), Congo or Iceland?: Iceland, at 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e) between Congo and Iceland?: 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Iceland?: 54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Congo and Iceland rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e)?: Congo ranks 159th and Iceland ranks 157th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Iceland: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-total-excluding-lulucf-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-total-excluding-lulucf-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/iceland/">Congo vs Iceland: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre
Unit: Mt CO2e per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 250 places, 12,804 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed: 20 September 2026

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.