How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Sri Lanka?

32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Croatia vs Sri Lanka: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e)

Croatia

0.0003 Mt CO2e per square kilometre

in 2023

Sri Lanka

0.0003 Mt CO2e per square kilometre

in 2023

Croatia rank

71st

Sri Lanka rank

69th

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e) over time

Croatia
Sri Lanka

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 0.0003 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0.0003 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Croatia, a difference of 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Croatia ahead.

Croatia ranks 71st and Sri Lanka ranks 69th of 203 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 3 and Sri Lanka in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Croatia	Sri Lanka	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0003 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0.0002 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Croatia
2000s	0.0004 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0.0002 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0.0002 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Croatia
2010s	0.0003 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0.0003 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Croatia
2020s	0.0003 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0.0004 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e), Croatia or Sri Lanka?: Sri Lanka, at 0.0003 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0.0003 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Croatia as of 2023.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e) between Croatia and Sri Lanka?: 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Sri Lanka?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Croatia and Sri Lanka rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e)?: Croatia ranks 71st and Sri Lanka ranks 69th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Croatia vs Sri Lanka: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-total-excluding-lulucf-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/croatia/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-total-excluding-lulucf-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/croatia/sri-lanka/">Croatia vs Sri Lanka: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre
Unit: Mt CO2e per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 250 places, 12,804 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed: 20 September 2026

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.