Dominican Republic vs Jamaica: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e)

Dominican Republic
0.0007 Mt CO2e per square kilometre
in 2023
Jamaica
0.0007 Mt CO2e per square kilometre
in 2023
Dominican Republic rank
43rd
Jamaica rank
41st

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e) over time

  • Dominican Republic
  • Jamaica
000.0010.0010.0010.001197019962023

How they compare

Jamaica currently reports 0.0007 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0.0007 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Dominican Republic, a difference of 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Jamaica ahead.

Dominican Republic ranks 43rd and Jamaica ranks 41st of 203 countries.

Jamaica has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominican Republic Jamaica Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0.0007 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0.0006 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Jamaica
1980s 0.0002 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0.0005 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0.0004 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Jamaica
1990s 0.0003 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0.0008 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0.0006 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Jamaica
2000s 0.0004 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0.001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0.0006 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Jamaica
2010s 0.0005 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0.0007 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0.0002 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Jamaica
2020s 0.0006 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0.0006 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Jamaica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e), Dominican Republic or Jamaica?
Jamaica, at 0.0007 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0.0007 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Dominican Republic as of 2023.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e) between Dominican Republic and Jamaica?
0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre, with Jamaica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Jamaica?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Dominican Republic and Jamaica rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e)?
Dominican Republic ranks 43rd and Jamaica ranks 41st of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dominican Republic vs Jamaica: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-total-excluding-lulucf-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/dominican-republic/jamaica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-total-excluding-lulucf-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/dominican-republic/jamaica/">Dominican Republic vs Jamaica: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre
Unit
Mt CO2e per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
250 places, 12,804 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.