How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and New Caledonia?

32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Estonia vs New Caledonia: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e)

Estonia

0.0003 Mt CO2e per square kilometre

in 2023

New Caledonia

0.0003 Mt CO2e per square kilometre

in 2023

Estonia rank

81st

New Caledonia rank

83rd

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e) over time

Estonia
New Caledonia

How they compare

Estonia currently reports 0.0003 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0.0003 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in New Caledonia, a difference of 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Estonia ahead.

Estonia ranks 81st and New Caledonia ranks 83rd of 203 countries.

Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Estonia	New Caledonia	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0005 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0.0004 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Estonia
2000s	0.0005 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0.0003 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Estonia
2010s	0.0005 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0.0002 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0.0003 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Estonia
2020s	0.0003 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0.0003 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Estonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e), Estonia or New Caledonia?: Estonia, at 0.0003 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0.0003 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in New Caledonia as of 2023.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e) between Estonia and New Caledonia?: 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre, with Estonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and New Caledonia?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Estonia and New Caledonia rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e)?: Estonia ranks 81st and New Caledonia ranks 83rd of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Estonia vs New Caledonia: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-total-excluding-lulucf-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/estonia/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-total-excluding-lulucf-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/estonia/new-caledonia/">Estonia vs New Caledonia: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre
Unit: Mt CO2e per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 250 places, 12,804 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed: 20 September 2026

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.