How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Tajikistan?

32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Eswatini vs Tajikistan: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e)

Eswatini

0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre

in 2023

Tajikistan

0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre

in 2023

Eswatini rank

135th

Tajikistan rank

133rd

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e) over time

Eswatini
Tajikistan

How they compare

Tajikistan currently reports 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre.

That makes Tajikistan's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Tajikistan ahead.

Eswatini ranks 135th and Tajikistan ranks 133rd of 203 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 3 and Tajikistan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Eswatini	Tajikistan	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Eswatini
2000s	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Eswatini
2010s	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Eswatini
2020s	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Tajikistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e), Eswatini or Tajikistan?: Tajikistan, at 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e) between Eswatini and Tajikistan?: 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre, with Tajikistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Tajikistan?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Tajikistan rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e)?: Eswatini ranks 135th and Tajikistan ranks 133rd of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Tajikistan: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-total-excluding-lulucf-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/tajikistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-total-excluding-lulucf-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/tajikistan/">Eswatini vs Tajikistan: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre
Unit: Mt CO2e per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 250 places, 12,804 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed: 20 September 2026

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.