How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Kiribati?

32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Kazakhstan vs Kiribati: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e)

Kazakhstan

0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre

in 2023

Kiribati

0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre

in 2023

Kazakhstan rank

124th

Kiribati rank

125th

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e) over time

Kazakhstan
Kiribati

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Kiribati, a difference of 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.

Kazakhstan ranks 124th and Kiribati ranks 125th of 203 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 3 and Kiribati in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Kazakhstan	Kiribati	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Kazakhstan
2000s	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Kazakhstan
2010s	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Kazakhstan
2020s	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Kiribati

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e), Kazakhstan or Kiribati?: Kazakhstan, at 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Kiribati as of 2023.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e) between Kazakhstan and Kiribati?: 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Kiribati?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Kazakhstan and Kiribati rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e)?: Kazakhstan ranks 124th and Kiribati ranks 125th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kazakhstan vs Kiribati: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-total-excluding-lulucf-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/kazakhstan/kiribati/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-total-excluding-lulucf-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/kazakhstan/kiribati/">Kazakhstan vs Kiribati: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre
Unit: Mt CO2e per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 250 places, 12,804 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed: 20 September 2026

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.