How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Sweden?

32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Kazakhstan vs Sweden: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e)

Kazakhstan

0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre

in 2023

Sweden

0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre

in 2023

Kazakhstan rank

124th

Sweden rank

127th

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e) over time

Kazakhstan
Sweden

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Sweden, a difference of 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre.

That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.1 times Sweden's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Sweden ahead.

Kazakhstan ranks 124th and Sweden ranks 127th of 203 countries.

Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Kazakhstan	Sweden	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0.0002 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Sweden
2000s	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Sweden
2010s	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Sweden
2020s	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e), Kazakhstan or Sweden?: Kazakhstan, at 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Sweden as of 2023.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e) between Kazakhstan and Sweden?: 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Sweden?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Kazakhstan and Sweden rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e)?: Kazakhstan ranks 124th and Sweden ranks 127th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kazakhstan vs Sweden: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-total-excluding-lulucf-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/kazakhstan/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-total-excluding-lulucf-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/kazakhstan/sweden/">Kazakhstan vs Sweden: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre
Unit: Mt CO2e per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 250 places, 12,804 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed: 20 September 2026

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.