How many years of comparable data are there for Laos and Norway?

54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Laos vs Norway: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e)

Laos

0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre

in 2023

Norway

0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre

in 2023

Laos rank

114th

Norway rank

113th

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e) over time

Laos
Norway

How they compare

Norway currently reports 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Laos, a difference of 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Norway has been ahead every year.

Laos ranks 114th and Norway ranks 113th of 203 countries.

Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Laos	Norway	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Norway
1980s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Norway
1990s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Norway
2000s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Norway
2010s	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Norway
2020s	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e), Laos or Norway?: Norway, at 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Laos as of 2023.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e) between Laos and Norway?: 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre, with Norway ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Laos and Norway?: 54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Laos and Norway rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e)?: Laos ranks 114th and Norway ranks 113th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Laos vs Norway: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-total-excluding-lulucf-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/lao-pdr/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-total-excluding-lulucf-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/lao-pdr/norway/">Laos vs Norway: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre
Unit: Mt CO2e per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 250 places, 12,804 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed: 20 September 2026

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.