Mexico vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e)

Mexico
0.0002 Mt CO2e per square kilometre
in 2023
Turks and Caicos Islands
0.0002 Mt CO2e per square kilometre
in 2023
Mexico rank
87th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
89th

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e) over time

  • Mexico
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
0000197019962023

How they compare

Mexico currently reports 0.0002 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0.0002 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre.

That makes Mexico's figure about 1.1 times Turks and Caicos Islands's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Mexico ahead.

Mexico ranks 87th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 89th of 203 countries.

Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mexico Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Mexico
1980s 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Mexico
1990s 0.0002 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0.0002 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Mexico
2000s 0.0002 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0.0002 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Mexico
2010s 0.0003 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Mexico
2020s 0.0002 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0.0002 Mt CO2e per square kilometre 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre Mexico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e), Mexico or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Mexico, at 0.0002 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0.0002 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2023.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e) between Mexico and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre, with Mexico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Turks and Caicos Islands?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Mexico and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e)?
Mexico ranks 87th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 89th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mexico vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-total-excluding-lulucf-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/mexico/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-total-excluding-lulucf-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/mexico/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Mexico vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre
Unit
Mt CO2e per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
250 places, 12,804 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.