How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Samoa?

54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Norway vs Samoa: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e)

Norway

0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre

in 2023

Samoa

0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre

in 2023

Norway rank

113th

Samoa rank

111th

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e) over time

Norway
Samoa

How they compare

Samoa currently reports 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Norway, a difference of 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Norway ahead.

Norway ranks 113th and Samoa ranks 111th of 203 countries.

Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Norway	Samoa	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Norway
1980s	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Norway
1990s	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Norway
2000s	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Norway
2010s	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Norway
2020s	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e), Norway or Samoa?: Samoa, at 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Norway as of 2023.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e) between Norway and Samoa?: 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre, with Samoa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Samoa?: 54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Norway and Samoa rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e)?: Norway ranks 113th and Samoa ranks 111th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Norway vs Samoa: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-total-excluding-lulucf-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/norway/samoa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-total-excluding-lulucf-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/norway/samoa/">Norway vs Samoa: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre
Unit: Mt CO2e per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 250 places, 12,804 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed: 20 September 2026

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.