How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and Uzbekistan?

32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Romania vs Uzbekistan: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e)

Romania

0.0003 Mt CO2e per square kilometre

in 2023

Uzbekistan

0.0003 Mt CO2e per square kilometre

in 2023

Romania rank

75th

Uzbekistan rank

76th

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e) over time

Romania
Uzbekistan

How they compare

Romania currently reports 0.0003 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0.0003 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Romania has been ahead every year.

Romania ranks 75th and Uzbekistan ranks 76th of 203 countries.

Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Romania	Uzbekistan	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0005 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0.0003 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0.0003 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Romania
2000s	0.0004 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0.0003 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Romania
2010s	0.0004 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0.0003 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0.0001 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Romania
2020s	0.0003 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0.0003 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre	Romania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e), Romania or Uzbekistan?: Romania, at 0.0003 Mt CO2e per square kilometre against 0.0003 Mt CO2e per square kilometre in Uzbekistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e) between Romania and Uzbekistan?: 0 Mt CO2e per square kilometre, with Romania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and Uzbekistan?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Romania and Uzbekistan rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e)?: Romania ranks 75th and Uzbekistan ranks 76th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Romania vs Uzbekistan: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-total-excluding-lulucf-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/romania/uzbekistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-total-excluding-lulucf-mt-co2e-per-square-kilometre/romania/uzbekistan/">Romania vs Uzbekistan: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per square kilometre
Unit: Mt CO2e per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 250 places, 12,804 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed: 20 September 2026

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.