Democratic Republic of Congo vs Costa Rica: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e)

Democratic Republic of Congo
0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Costa Rica
0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
179th
Costa Rica rank
177th

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e) over time

  • Democratic Republic of Congo
  • Costa Rica
0000197019972024

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP against 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP in Democratic Republic of Congo, a difference of 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP.

That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.1 times Democratic Republic of Congo's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Costa Rica ahead.

Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 179th and Costa Rica ranks 177th of 200 countries.

Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of Congo Costa Rica Difference Ahead
1970s 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP Costa Rica
1980s 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP Costa Rica
1990s 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP Costa Rica
2000s 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP Costa Rica
2010s 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP Costa Rica
2020s 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e), Democratic Republic of Congo or Costa Rica?
Costa Rica, at 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP against 0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP in Democratic Republic of Congo as of 2024.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e) between Democratic Republic of Congo and Costa Rica?
0 Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Costa Rica?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Costa Rica rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) emissions (total) excluding lulucf (mt co2e)?
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 179th and Costa Rica ranks 177th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of Congo vs Costa Rica: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-total-excluding-lulucf-mt-co2e-per-unit-of-gdp/congo-dem-rep/costa-rica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-co2-emissions-total-excluding-lulucf-mt-co2e-per-unit-of-gdp/congo-dem-rep/costa-rica/">Democratic Republic of Congo vs Costa Rica: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e), per unit of GDP
Unit
Mt CO2e per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
247 places, 12,498 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.