Angola vs Jordan: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF
Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF over time
- Angola
- Jordan
How they compare
Angola currently reports 150.2% against 139.7% in Jordan, a difference of 10.5%.
That makes Angola's figure about 1.1 times Jordan's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Angola ahead.
Angola ranks 93rd and Jordan ranks 95th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 2 and Jordan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 26.3% | 32.1% | 5.8% | Jordan |
| 2000s | 53.9% | 89.2% | 35.3% | Jordan |
| 2010s | 145.5% | 140.3% | 5.2% | Angola |
| 2020s | 128.3% | 126.8% | 1.5% | Angola |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) emissions (total) excluding lulucf, Angola or Jordan?
- Angola, at 150.2% against 139.7% in Jordan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) emissions (total) excluding lulucf between Angola and Jordan?
- 10.5%, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Jordan?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
- How do Angola and Jordan rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) emissions (total) excluding lulucf?
- Angola ranks 93rd and Jordan ranks 95th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (% change from 1990). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Change of emissions (as %) of current year with respect to emissions in baseline year 1990 emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2), one of the six Kyoto greenhouse gases (GHG), from the agriculture, energy, waste, and industrial sectors, excluding LULUCF.. The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5). Negative values indicate that the emission level for that year is lower than the emissions level in 1990.