Aruba vs Costa Rica: Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF
Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF over time
- Aruba
- Costa Rica
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 187.2% against 176.6% in Aruba, a difference of 10.6%.
That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.1 times Aruba's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Aruba ahead.
Aruba ranks 89th and Costa Rica ranks 86th of 201 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Costa Rica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 42.9% | 57.8% | 14.8% | Costa Rica |
| 2000s | 86.3% | 121.1% | 34.8% | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 118.5% | 172.9% | 54.3% | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 161.2% | 173.6% | 12.5% | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher carbon dioxide (co2) emissions (total) excluding lulucf, Aruba or Costa Rica?
- Costa Rica, at 187.2% against 176.6% in Aruba as of 2024.
- What is the difference in carbon dioxide (co2) emissions (total) excluding lulucf between Aruba and Costa Rica?
- 10.6%, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Costa Rica?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
- How do Aruba and Costa Rica rank globally for carbon dioxide (co2) emissions (total) excluding lulucf?
- Aruba ranks 89th and Costa Rica ranks 86th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- EDGAR (Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research) Community GHG Database, Joint Research Centre (JRC) - European Commission, published as Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (% change from 1990). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Change of emissions (as %) of current year with respect to emissions in baseline year 1990 emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2), one of the six Kyoto greenhouse gases (GHG), from the agriculture, energy, waste, and industrial sectors, excluding LULUCF.. The measure is standardized to carbon dioxide equivalent values using the Global Warming Potential (GWP) factors of IPCC's 5th Assessment Report (AR5). Negative values indicate that the emission level for that year is lower than the emissions level in 1990.